Hi,
I am currently using two docker instances - one for main storage and second one for temporal storage and modifications. What bothers me is that when I send a whole Patient to the second instance some data is missing.
Sure I would really appreciate Your help. It is kind of difficult to me to reproduce all the mentioned log files on our working PACS environment. Currently, I can interact only with the second instance.
Data - it seems that the type is irrelevant, it has to be 1800+ DICOMS in one specific Patient. Also I can send all the missing data one by one (eg. series).
Operation - DICOM Store of a single Patient (curl -X POST http://user:pass1978@192.168.201.1:8080/modalities/temp/store -d $patient_id)
Target - Orthanc docker instance (config in previous message)Logs - I can produce logs from targeted instance:
… 1802 repetitions of storing sequence which reflects number of stored scans (out of 2800)
I0918 08:33:51.486371 PluginsManager.cpp:172] New instance has been added to series 62374129-f7aceefc-03d47a89-ac39bb06-ddc1b462, invalidating it
I0918 08:33:51.486386 OrthancPlugins.cpp:1495] Plugin making REST GET call on URI /instances/bb60be3c-dfec5518-c2483d33-8ccf615f-2d328496 (built-in API)
I0918 08:33:51.566260 main.cpp:215] Incoming Store request from AET MV300_3110 on IP 172.17.0.1, calling AET XNAT-ROUTER
I0918 08:33:51.569761 FilesystemStorage.cpp:118] Creating attachment “2e08f8d5-4dd5-4dce-8f87-b744808ee2ff” of “DICOM” type (size: 1MB)
I0918 08:33:51.571550 FilesystemStorage.cpp:118] Creating attachment “c568f32a-c2db-4ebd-a35d-634f4e4dcae5” of “JSON summary of DICOM” type (size: 1MB)
I0918 08:33:51.572549 ServerContext.cpp:408] New instance stored
I0918 08:33:51.572599 PluginsManager.cpp:172] New instance has been added to series 62374129-f7aceefc-03d47a89-ac39bb06-ddc1b462, invalidating it
I0918 08:33:51.572654 OrthancPlugins.cpp:1495] Plugin making REST GET call on URI /instances/7a63688f-96ba07b5-605703b5-e879e460-9e1c47ba (built-in API)
I0918 08:33:51.652977 main.cpp:215] Incoming Store request from AET MV300_3110 on IP 172.17.0.1, calling AET XNAT-ROUTER
I0918 08:33:51.656769 FilesystemStorage.cpp:118] Creating attachment “dbeb2abc-0252-49f0-9988-51485a2cbbe2” of “DICOM” type (size: 1MB)
I0918 08:33:51.658572 FilesystemStorage.cpp:118] Creating attachment “04edd9b5-1625-4763-9427-f07bbd45c107” of “JSON summary of DICOM” type (size: 1MB)
I0918 08:33:51.659648 ServerContext.cpp:408] New instance stored
I0918 08:33:51.659822 PluginsManager.cpp:172] New instance has been added to series 62374129-f7aceefc-03d47a89-ac39bb06-ddc1b462, invalidating it
I0918 08:33:51.659872 OrthancPlugins.cpp:1495] Plugin making REST GET call on URI /instances/53b1fb60-1b1ac762-b05e8c00-ec85b4c1-d26e7f24 (built-in API)
I0918 08:33:51.719671 CommandDispatcher.cpp:913] DUL Peer Requested Release
I0918 08:33:51.719705 CommandDispatcher.cpp:920] Association Release
I0918 08:33:51.721251 CommandDispatcher.cpp:507] Association Received from AET MV300_3110 on IP 172.17.0.1
I0918 08:33:51.767816 main.cpp:195] Incoming connection from AET MV300_3110 on IP 172.17.0.1, calling AET XNAT-ROUTER
I0918 08:33:51.768060 CommandDispatcher.cpp:710] Association Acknowledged (Max Send PDV: 16372)
I0918 08:33:51.768885 CommandDispatcher.cpp:913] DUL Peer Requested Release
I0918 08:33:51.768917 CommandDispatcher.cpp:920] Association Release
I hope this may give You some more information. If not please let me know, I will try to create more logs.
B.
W dniu wtorek, 17 września 2019 15:29:26 UTC+2 użytkownik Sébastien Jodogne napisał:
I have identified broken DICOMs. They come from rf mapping service sequence. If I send them to Horos/XNAT that series is just omitted. Can You tell me how to do the same with Orthanc?
B.
W dniu środa, 18 września 2019 10:57:04 UTC+2 użytkownik Bartosz Kossowski napisał:
Then my problem is can’t send that file from one Orthanc to another. When the file is in a middle series the communications breaks down immediately and following series are not send. However, XNAT or Horos do receive all the following data from the same Orthanc instance apart from the broken files.
I’d expect the same from Orthanc to prevent from data loss.
B.