Thank you for your reply, Sébastien. I understand your targeting etc. That said, the last part of my previous message, i.e. about modalities that can be selected in the “Modalities in Study” column, was precisely about Orthanc Explorer 2.
I would dare say that it is not so much about user-friendliness but about some general logic of the UI. In “Modalities in Study”, there are these options: “all”, “None” (by the way, I would probably either capitalize or not capitalize both), and 14 specific modality types. Suppose the topic starter connects an XC modality, which sends studies to Orthanc in full compliance with DICOM protocol. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Orthanc will accept those studies and include them in the database. In that case, if a user uses Orthanc Explorer 2 and selects “all” for “Modalities in Study”, that user will see all studies, including XC, right? If the user unchecks all those 14 checkboxes, then “None” is checked automatically. Does it mean that such user will see no studies at all, or will he or she still see XC studies and other studies (if there are any) that do not belong to any of those 14 specific modality types (like, say, IO or RF)?