Hello.
I cannot solve this issue, some studies that go up to the Windows version of Orthanc, and I take a measurement, it comes out in pixels. If the study is sent to the old efilm, it measures in mm. can someone give me an idea? Thank you
Hello.
I cannot solve this issue, some studies that go up to the Windows version of Orthanc, and I take a measurement, it comes out in pixels. If the study is sent to the old efilm, it measures in mm. can someone give me an idea? Thank you
Hi Alberto,
The OsimisViewer displays the measures in pixels when it can not find or understand the PixelSpacing tag (or similar tags).
Since the Osimis Viewer is now deprecated, it won’t be updated to fix any issues.
I would first advise you to try with StoneViewer instead which now has the same features. If the distance is not displayed correctly in Stone, please share an anonymized version of your image and we’ll ask Sébastien to have a look at it.
Best regards,
Alain.
Thanks for your answer. I have tried with Stone Web Viewer and the measurement is in pixels. The reference series is the one with 110 images and the number of the image is 44. I add the zip of the study.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZueJGQcov9NNIwzM3H6XiSyiB8QZ2BSF/view?usp=sharing
Hi Alberto,
This series contains “secondary capture” images that do not contain any information about pixelspacing. They are the equivalent of a screenshot.
I have tried opening it in Radiant and it shows distance in pixels too
I can’t think of any means for a viewer to guess the pixel spacing out of the image.
Maybe eFilm displays it correctly because it was the software that generated these secondary captures ?
Best regards,
Alain.